ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs RX 6900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6900 XT and Radeon X800 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6900 XT
2020, $999
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
63.87
+42480%

6900 XT outperforms X800 PRO by a whopping 42480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking341480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.42no data
Power efficiency16.350.24
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNavi 21R423
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1825 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate720.05.700
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12812
TMUs32012
Ray Tracing Cores80no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6900 XT 63.87
+42480%
ATI X800 PRO 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6900 XT 26725
+41658%
Samples: 7164
ATI X800 PRO 64
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD196-0−1
1440p134-0−1
4K83-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.10no data
1440p7.46no data
4K12.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 195 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 0−1
Far Cry 5 190−200 0−1
Fortnite 300−350 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 283 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 190−200 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 196 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 0−1
Dota 2 160−170 0−1
Far Cry 5 190−200 0−1
Fortnite 300−350 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 279 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 190−200 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 0−1
Metro Exodus 164 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 323 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 197 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 0−1
Dota 2 160−170 0−1
Far Cry 5 190−200 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 248 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164 0−1
Valorant 411 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+50300%
1−2
−50300%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 0−1
Metro Exodus 102 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 400−450
+44800%
1−2
−44800%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 196 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 0−1
Far Cry 5 160−170 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 231 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 150−160 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 67 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122 0−1
Valorant 300−350 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 134 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Dota 2 150−160 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 162 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.87 0.15
Recency 28 October 2020 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 48 Watt

RX 6900 XT has a 42480% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800 PRO, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 PRO in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4253 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 XT or Radeon X800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.