RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

Place in performance ranking	18	22
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	21.15	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 21	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 December 2020 (3 years ago)	9 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$957 (1x MSRP)	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	6144
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2250 MHz	2175 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	720.0	417.6

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	245 mm
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6900 XT 69.36
+3.1%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 67.25

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms RTX 4000 Ada Generation by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6900 XT 26855
+3.1%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 26038

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms RTX 4000 Ada Generation by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	193 +7.2%	180−190 −7.2%
1440p	134 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
4K	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

130−140
+4.6%

130−140

−4.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 +5.6%	160−170 −5.6%
Battlefield 5	195 +8.3%	180−190 −8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +8.1%	160−170 −8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +4.6%	130−140 −4.6%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	126 +5%	120−130 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	283 +4.8%	270−280 −4.8%
Hitman 3	283 +4.8%	270−280 −4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	205 +7.9%	190−200 −7.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	196 +3.2%	190−200 −3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 +5.7%	210−220 −5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190 +5.6%	180−190 −5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	106 +6%	100−105 −6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	142 +9.2%	130−140 −9.2%
Battlefield 5	196 +3.2%	190−200 −3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +8.1%	160−170 −8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +4.6%	130−140 −4.6%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	123 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
Forza Horizon 4	279 +3.3%	270−280 −3.3%
Hitman 3	276 +6.2%	260−270 −6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	174 +8.8%	160−170 −8.8%
Metro Exodus	164 +9.3%	150−160 −9.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	124 +3.3%	120−130 −3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	207 +3.5%	200−210 −3.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	323 +7.7%	300−310 −7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170 +6.3%	160−170 −6.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	137 +5.4%	130−140 −5.4%
Battlefield 5	197 +3.7%	190−200 −3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +4.6%	130−140 −4.6%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Forza Horizon 4	248 +3.3%	240−250 −3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	164 +9.3%	150−160 −9.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 +10%	110−120 −10%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +5%	120−130 −5%
Hitman 3	213 +6.5%	200−210 −6.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	136 +4.6%	130−140 −4.6%
Metro Exodus	102 +7.4%	95−100 −7.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +9.3%	75−80 −9.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	159 +6%	150−160 −6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Battlefield 5	196 +3.2%	190−200 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Forza Horizon 4	231 +5%	220−230 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +4%	75−80 −4%
Hitman 3	128 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Metro Exodus	67 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 +10%	50−55 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85 +6.3%	80−85 −6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +10%	60−65 −10%
Battlefield 5	134 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +9.3%	75−80 −9.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	101 +6.3%	95−100 −6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +8%	150−160 −8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +8%	50−55 −8%

This is how RX 6900 XT and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is 7.2% faster than RTX 4000 Ada Generation in 1080p
RX 6900 XT is 11.7% faster than RTX 4000 Ada Generation in 1440p
RX 6900 XT is 3.8% faster than RTX 4000 Ada Generation in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	69.36	67.25
Recency	8 December 2020	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt