RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800
2020, $579
16 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
52.73
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
56.49
+7.1%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms RX 6800 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.82no data
Power efficiency16.4333.84
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)9 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38406144
Core clock speed1700 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2417.6
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores6048
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB6 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm245 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 52.73
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 56.49
+7.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 22060
Samples: 5018
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 23634
+7.1%
Samples: 1151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD175180−190
+2.9%
1440p102
+2%
100−110
4K6265−70
+4.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.31no data
1440p5.68no data
4K9.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 350 350−400
Cyberpunk 2077 135 140−150
+3.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 322
+7.3%
300−310

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 349 350−400
+0.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 115 120−130
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 197 210−220
+6.6%
Fortnite 230−240 250−260
+6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 210−220
+2.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 259 270−280
+4.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 290−300
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 104 110−120
+5.8%
Dota 2 145 150−160
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 186 190−200
+2.2%
Far Cry 6 161 170−180
+5.6%
Fortnite 230−240 250−260
+6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 210−220
+2.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 159 170−180
+6.9%
Metro Exodus 147 150−160
+2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 269 280−290
+4.1%
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 99 100−105
+1%
Dota 2 128 130−140
+1.6%
Far Cry 5 174 180−190
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 210−220
+2.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152 160−170
+5.3%
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240 250−260
+6.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175 180−190
+2.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 400−450
+2.3%
Far Cry 6 115 120−130
+4.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 125 130−140
+4%
Metro Exodus 89 95−100
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 74 75−80
+1.4%
Far Cry 5 163 170−180
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 170−180
+1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 120−130
+1.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 150−160
+1.4%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 47 50−55
+6.4%
Far Cry 6 69 70−75
+1.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 132 140−150
+6.1%
Metro Exodus 55 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99 100−105
+1%
Valorant 300−350
+2.3%
300−310

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 95−100
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 70−75
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 34 35−40
+2.9%
Dota 2 102
+2%
100−105
Far Cry 5 91 95−100
+4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 120−130
+0.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 95−100
+3.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 80−85
+2.6%

This is how RX 6800 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.73 56.49
Recency 28 October 2020 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6800 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2455 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 69 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.