ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs RX 6900 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6900 XT with Mobility Radeon HD 3650, including specs and performance data.
6900 XT outperforms Mobility HD 3650 by a whopping 19872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 35 | 1370 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.15 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.36 | 0.82 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Navi 21 | M86 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 October 2020 (5 years ago) | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 120 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 26,800 million | 378 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 | 4.000 |
| Floating-point processing power | 23.04 TFLOPS | 0.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 128 | 4 |
| TMUs | 320 | 8 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 1.3 MB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 3-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 199 | 0−1 |
| 1440p | 137 | 0−1 |
| 4K | 85 | -0−1 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 5.02 | no data |
| 1440p | 7.29 | no data |
| 4K | 11.75 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+30600%
|
1−2
−30600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 160−170
+16100%
|
1−2
−16100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 150−160
+3000%
|
5−6
−3000%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 195 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+30600%
|
1−2
−30600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 160−170
+16100%
|
1−2
−16100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 190−200 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 300−350
+30100%
|
1−2
−30100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 283
+6975%
|
4−5
−6975%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190−200 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 150−160
+3000%
|
5−6
−3000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2386%
|
7−8
−2386%
|
| Valorant | 350−400
+1296%
|
24−27
−1296%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 196 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+30600%
|
1−2
−30600%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+1893%
|
14−16
−1893%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 160−170
+16100%
|
1−2
−16100%
|
| Dota 2 | 160−170
+1590%
|
10−11
−1590%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 190−200 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 300−350
+30100%
|
1−2
−30100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 279
+6875%
|
4−5
−6875%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190−200 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 160−170 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 150−160
+3000%
|
5−6
−3000%
|
| Metro Exodus | 164 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2386%
|
7−8
−2386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 323
+6360%
|
5−6
−6360%
|
| Valorant | 350−400
+1296%
|
24−27
−1296%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 197 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 160−170
+16100%
|
1−2
−16100%
|
| Dota 2 | 160−170
+1590%
|
10−11
−1590%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 190−200 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 248
+6100%
|
4−5
−6100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 150−160
+3000%
|
5−6
−3000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2386%
|
7−8
−2386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 164
+3180%
|
5−6
−3180%
|
| Valorant | 411
+1481%
|
24−27
−1481%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 300−350
+30100%
|
1−2
−30100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+6433%
|
3−4
−6433%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 500−550 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 102 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+5733%
|
3−4
−5733%
|
| Valorant | 450−500
+22400%
|
2−3
−22400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 196 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 160−170 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 231
+23000%
|
1−2
−23000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 85−90 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150−160
+15400%
|
1−2
−15400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 150−160
+1021%
|
14−16
−1021%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 67 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 122 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 300−350
+16350%
|
2−3
−16350%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 134 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 150−160 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 162 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+9500%
|
1−2
−9500%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+3850%
|
2−3
−3850%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 23000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed ATI Mobility HD 3650 in all 30 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 63.91 | 0.32 |
| Recency | 28 October 2020 | 7 January 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 30 Watt |
RX 6900 XT has a 19871.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 3650, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
