Radeon RX 7800M vs RX 6800S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6800S and Radeon RX 7800M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
6800S outperforms 7800M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 134 | 136 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.85 | 15.89 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
| GPU code name | Navi 23 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) | 11 September 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2100 MHz | 2335 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,060 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 268.8 | 560.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.602 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 60 |
| L0 Cache | 512 KB | 960 KB |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 116
+5.5%
| 110−120
−5.5%
|
| 1440p | 75
+7.1%
| 70−75
−7.1%
|
| 4K | 40
+14.3%
| 35−40
−14.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+1%
|
210−220
−1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 141
+8.5%
|
130−140
−8.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 85−90
+4.7%
|
85−90
−4.7%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
120−130
−9.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+1%
|
210−220
−1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 111
+0.9%
|
110−120
−0.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120
+9.1%
|
110−120
−9.1%
|
| Fortnite | 160−170
+3.8%
|
160−170
−3.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+5.7%
|
140−150
−5.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 133
+2.3%
|
130−140
−2.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 85−90
+4.7%
|
85−90
−4.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+7.9%
|
140−150
−7.9%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+1.8%
|
220−230
−1.8%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
120−130
−9.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+1%
|
210−220
−1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+3%
|
270−280
−3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 82
+2.5%
|
80−85
−2.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 128
+6.7%
|
120−130
−6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 112
+1.8%
|
110−120
−1.8%
|
| Fortnite | 160−170
+3.8%
|
160−170
−3.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+5.7%
|
140−150
−5.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 131
+9.2%
|
120−130
−9.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 125
+4.2%
|
120−130
−4.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 85−90
+4.7%
|
85−90
−4.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 90−95
+1.1%
|
90−95
−1.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+7.9%
|
140−150
−7.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 164
+2.5%
|
160−170
−2.5%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+1.8%
|
220−230
−1.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
120−130
−9.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 74
+5.7%
|
70−75
−5.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 107
+7%
|
100−105
−7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 104
+4%
|
100−105
−4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+5.7%
|
140−150
−5.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 85−90
+4.7%
|
85−90
−4.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+7.9%
|
140−150
−7.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 92
+2.2%
|
90−95
−2.2%
|
| Valorant | 214
+1.9%
|
210−220
−1.9%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 160−170
+3.8%
|
160−170
−3.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+1.1%
|
95−100
−1.1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+2.7%
|
260−270
−2.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 66
+1.5%
|
65−70
−1.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2.9%
|
170−180
−2.9%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+2.4%
|
250−260
−2.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+3.2%
|
95−100
−3.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39
+11.4%
|
35−40
−11.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+3.3%
|
90−95
−3.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+9%
|
100−105
−9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+12.5%
|
40−45
−12.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+2.9%
|
70−75
−2.9%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−110
+1%
|
100−105
−1%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+10%
|
40−45
−10%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+2.5%
|
80−85
−2.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+1.7%
|
60−65
−1.7%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+1.3%
|
230−240
−1.3%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+1.7%
|
60−65
−1.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+10%
|
40−45
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
+10%
|
100−105
−10%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+2.9%
|
70−75
−2.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+2%
|
50−55
−2%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
This is how RX 6800S and RX 7800M compete in popular games:
- RX 6800S is 5% faster in 1080p
- RX 6800S is 7% faster in 1440p
- RX 6800S is 14% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.83 | 35.53 |
| Recency | 4 January 2022 | 11 September 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
RX 6800S has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% lower power consumption.
RX 7800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6800S and Radeon RX 7800M.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
