Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 GRE 16 GB 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
2023, $334
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
47.83

9060 XT 16GB outperforms 6750 GRE 12 GB by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
RX 9060 XT 16GB RX 9060 XT 16GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation86.14no data
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 22no data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 October 2023 (2 years ago)2 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$334 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed2321 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2581 MHz2530 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate413.0no data
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache640 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data
L3 Cache96 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
−22.1%
171
+22.1%
1440p60−65
−30%
78
+30%
4K35−40
−37.1%
48
+37.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p5.57no data
4K9.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 22% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 37% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 47.83 58.05
Recency 17 October 2023 2 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
RX 9060 XT 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
vs
RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 GRE
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RX 9060 XT 8 GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
H200 SXM 141 GB H200 SXM 141 GB
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
vs
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
vs
RTX 4010 4010
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
vs
Voodoo4 4500 PCI
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
vs
RX 6800 3456SP Radeon RX 6800 3456SP
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
vs
RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 214 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 252 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.