Radeon 8060S vs RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB with Radeon 8060S, including specs and performance data.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
2023
10 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.19
+4.9%

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms 8060S by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation83.83no data
Power efficiency19.80no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 22Strix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 October 2023 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$309 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1941 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2450 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate352.8373.6
Floating-point processing power11.29 TFLOPS11.96 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144160
Ray Tracing Cores3640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount10 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 44.19
+4.9%
Radeon 8060S 42.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 18519
+4.9%
Radeon 8060S 17660

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
−1.5%
132
+1.5%
1440p80−85
+1.3%
79
−1.3%
4K50−55
−4%
52
+4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.38no data
1440p3.86no data
4K6.18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+0%
201
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+0%
127
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+0%
218
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+0%
114
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Sons of the Forest 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 1% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.19 42.14
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8060S, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and Radeon 8060S.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 8060S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 85 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.