Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs RX 6700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6700M
2020
10 GB GDDR6, 135 Watt
34.86
+703%

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking138634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameR21M-E110-70Raphael
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (3 years ago)26 September 2022 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304128
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Wattno data
Texture fill rate324.0no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount10 GBno data
Memory bus width160 Bitno data
Memory clock speed16000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 34.86
+703%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.34

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6700M 33497
+1007%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 1007% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6700M 66973
+485%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11455

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 485% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6700M 27924
+1121%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2287

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 1121% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6700M 91672
+501%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 15247

RX 6700M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 501% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+553%
19
−553%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 111 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 100 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 202 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 96 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 87 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 91 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 64 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+730%
10−11
−730%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how RX 6700M and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700M is 553% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.86 4.34
Recency 1 September 2020 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

The Radeon RX 6700M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 105 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 207 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.