Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Radeon RX 6700M

Place in the ranking	144	417
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.86	19.72
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	no data
GPU code name	Navi 22	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1536
Core clock speed	1489 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	11.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	144	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	no data
Memory bus width	160 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 35.15
+206%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.50

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700M 33497
+374%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700M 66973
+178%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700M 27924
+300%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6700M 8989
+352%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

121
+227%

−227%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+233%

18−20

−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +213%	24−27 −213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 +227%	30−33 −227%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +223%	35−40 −223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +238%	21−24 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +222%	27−30 −222%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +227%	55−60 −227%
Hitman 3	111 +217%	35−40 −217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +231%	45−50 −231%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +229%	35−40 −229%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +233%	30−33 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +210%	40−45 −210%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +249%	35−40 −249%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +213%	24−27 −213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	82 +242%	24−27 −242%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +223%	35−40 −223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +238%	21−24 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +222%	27−30 −222%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +227%	55−60 −227%
Hitman 3	96 +220%	30−33 −220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +231%	45−50 −231%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +229%	35−40 −229%
Red Dead Redemption 2	91 +237%	27−30 −237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	186 +210%	60−65 −210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +243%	21−24 −243%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +249%	35−40 −249%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +213%	24−27 −213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +238%	21−24 −238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +238%	21−24 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +227%	55−60 −227%
Hitman 3	90 +233%	27−30 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +231%	45−50 −231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170 +209%	55−60 −209%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +217%	30−33 −217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	64 +256%	18−20 −256%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

88
+226%

27−30

−226%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +214%	21−24 −214%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +206%	65−70 −206%
Hitman 3	40−45 +214%	14−16 −214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +208%	24−27 −208%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +214%	21−24 −214%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +242%	24−27 −242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +243%	14−16 −243%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +224%	55−60 −224%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+233%

18−20

−233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +222%	9−10 −222%
Hitman 3	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +236%	50−55 −236%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +207%	14−16 −207%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +229%	7−8 −229%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +214%	7−8 −214%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +243%	14−16 −243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +229%	14−16 −229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%