UHD Graphics 16EU vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.46no data
Power efficiency17.66no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 23Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed2055 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate337.37.200
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2190 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 16EU, on the other hand, has 1073.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650 XT and UHD Graphics 16EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU
UHD Graphics 16EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3312 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 14 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.