GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 XT and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6500 XT
2022, $199
8 GB GDDR6, 107 Watt
22.98
RTX 4060 Ti
2023, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
54.00
+135%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms 6500 XT by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking27958
Place by popularity7849
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.8278.56
Power efficiency16.7426.30
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)18 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4060 Ti has 83% better value for money than RX 6500 XT.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244352
Core clock speed2610 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2815 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate180.2344.8
Floating-point processing powerno data22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs64136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Cores1634
L0 Cache256 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB32 MB
L3 Cache16 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2248 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6500 XT 22.98
RTX 4060 Ti 54.00
+135%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9613
Samples: 3418
RTX 4060 Ti 22593
+135%
Samples: 16026

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
−55%
140−150
1440p3170−75
+126%
4K1735−40
+106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.162.85
+9.8%
1440p6.425.70
+11.2%
4K11.7111.40
+2.6%
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 10% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 11% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT and RTX 4060 Ti have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 281 650−700
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 72 160−170
+122%
Hogwarts Legacy 80 180−190
+125%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 77 180−190
+134%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 220−230
+134%
Counter-Strike 2 194 450−500
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 54 120−130
+122%
Far Cry 5 102 230−240
+125%
Fortnite 110−120 270−280
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 220−230
+134%
Hogwarts Legacy 60 140−150
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 210−220
+128%
Valorant 160−170 350−400
+115%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 220−230
+134%
Counter-Strike 2 82 190−200
+132%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 550−600
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 34 75−80
+121%
Dota 2 145 300−310
+107%
Far Cry 5 92 210−220
+128%
Fortnite 110−120 270−280
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 220−230
+134%
Grand Theft Auto V 86 200−210
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 48 110−120
+129%
Metro Exodus 52 120−130
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 210−220
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 210−220
+128%
Valorant 160−170 350−400
+115%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 220−230
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 30 70−75
+133%
Dota 2 110 250−260
+127%
Far Cry 5 86 200−210
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 220−230
+134%
Hogwarts Legacy 33 75−80
+127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 210−220
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 120−130
+122%
Valorant 160−170 350−400
+115%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 270−280
+131%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35 80−85
+129%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 350−400
+110%
Grand Theft Auto V 37 85−90
+130%
Metro Exodus 18 40−45
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 400−450
+130%
Valorant 190−200 400−450
+111%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 150−160
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 17 35−40
+106%
Far Cry 5 57 130−140
+128%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 140−150
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 23 50−55
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 85−90
+130%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 130−140
+132%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7 16−18
+129%
Grand Theft Auto V 34 75−80
+121%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 35−40
+133%
Metro Exodus 11 24−27
+118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 65−70
+132%
Valorant 130−140 300−310
+131%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 80−85
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 50−55
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 4 9−10
+125%
Dota 2 67 150−160
+124%
Far Cry 5 23 50−55
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 95−100
+132%
Hogwarts Legacy 9 21−24
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 55−60
+120%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 60−65
+131%

This is how RX 6500 XT and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 122% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 126% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.98 54.00
Recency 19 January 2022 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 160 Watt

RX 6500 XT has 33% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3959 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13254 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6500 XT or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.