GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6300 Radeon RX 6400 Radeon RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
VS
MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6400 with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6400
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 53 Watt
19.85
+6%

RX 6400 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 6400 RX 6400
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281297
Place by popularity9217
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.17no data
Power efficiency25.8428.70
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1923 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed2321 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate111.494.53
Floating-point processing power3.565 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Cores1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−5%
42
+5%
1440p30−35
−10%
33
+10%
4K24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.98no data
1440p5.30no data
4K6.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Elden Ring 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Elden Ring 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 43
+0%
43
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+0%
56
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RX 6400 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.85 18.72
Recency 19 January 2022 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 45 Watt

RX 6400 has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 17.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6400 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
A2 A2
vs
L4 L4
A2 A2
vs
A2 PCIe A2 PCIe
A2 A2
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RX 6500M Radeon RX 6500M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 2036 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2321 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.