Arc A770M vs Radeon RX 6400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6400 with Arc A770M, including specs and performance data.

RX 6400
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 53 Watt
19.85

Arc A770M outperforms RX 6400 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281182
Place by popularity92not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.17no data
Power efficiency25.8417.78
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684096
Core clock speed1923 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed2321 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate111.4524.8
Floating-point processing power3.565 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs48256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6400 19.85
Arc A770M 30.92
+55.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6400 7632
Arc A770M 11888
+55.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−58.3%
95
+58.3%
1440p30−35
−80%
54
+80%
4K24−27
−62.5%
39
+62.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.65no data
1440p5.30no data
4K6.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Elden Ring 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+0%
256
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 211
+0%
211
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+0%
179
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RX 6400 and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 63% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.85 30.92
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 120 Watt

RX 6400 has 126.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 55.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop card while Arc A770M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2036 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.