RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300M with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.


RX 6300M
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
15.35

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms 6300M by a whopping 339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.7724.72
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD103
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687680
Core clock speed2000 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate115.2619.2
Floating-point processing power3.686 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Cores1260
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6300M 15.35
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 67.41
+339%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300M 6421
Samples: 5
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 28359
+342%
Samples: 141

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−331%
250−260
+331%
Valorant 120−130
−333%
550−600
+333%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−339%
900−950
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dota 2 95−100
−312%
400−450
+312%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−324%
250−260
+324%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−331%
250−260
+331%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−329%
180−190
+329%
Valorant 120−130
−333%
550−600
+333%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dota 2 95−100
−312%
400−450
+312%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−331%
250−260
+331%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−329%
180−190
+329%
Valorant 120−130
−333%
550−600
+333%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−335%
500−550
+335%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−328%
650−700
+328%
Valorant 150−160
−314%
650−700
+314%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−332%
190−200
+332%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−312%
140−150
+312%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Valorant 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Dota 2 55−60
−329%
240−250
+329%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.35 67.41
Recency 4 January 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 210 Watt

RX 6300M has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 339% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6300M or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.