GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX 580X

Place in performance ranking	256	543
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	14.74	2.38
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	N17S-G2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)	20 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$191	$1165

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580X has 519% better value for money than GeForce MX250.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	384
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1518 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	1582 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	10/25 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	24.91
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 580X and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580X 20.14
+222%

GeForce MX250 6.26

Radeon RX 580X outperforms GeForce MX250 by 222% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 580X 7798
+222%

GeForce MX250 2423

Radeon RX 580X outperforms GeForce MX250 by 222% in Passmark.