Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs RX 580

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5
22.94
+84.6%

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking226367
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.818.84
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 20Vega Mobile
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 November 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$138 (0.6x MSRP)$511

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 has 124% better value for money than Pro Vega 16.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1257 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1340 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate193.076.16
Floating-point performance6,175 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 580 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.94
+84.6%
Pro Vega 16 12.43

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 85% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 580 8877
+84.6%
Pro Vega 16 4809

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 85% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 580 19274
+82.4%
Pro Vega 16 10569

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 82% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 580 13927
+79.8%
Pro Vega 16 7745

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 80% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 580 82516
+46.6%
Pro Vega 16 56273

RX 580 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 47% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD97
+64.4%
59
−64.4%
1440p43
+105%
21−24
−105%
4K36
−5.6%
38
+5.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+123%
24−27
−123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+100%
20−22
−100%
Battlefield 5 124
+188%
40−45
−188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+87.5%
30−35
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 83
+159%
30−35
−159%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+144%
30−35
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+145%
40−45
−145%
Hitman 3 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74
+185%
24−27
−185%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+91.3%
21−24
−91.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+80.8%
24−27
−80.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+100%
20−22
−100%
Battlefield 5 102
+137%
40−45
−137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+87.5%
30−35
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 76
+138%
30−35
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 78
+129%
30−35
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+130%
40−45
−130%
Hitman 3 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Metro Exodus 48
+153%
18−20
−153%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+142%
24−27
−142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+177%
24−27
−177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+91.3%
21−24
−91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+100%
20−22
−100%
Battlefield 5 93
+116%
40−45
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 71
+122%
30−35
−122%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
+109%
30−35
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+86.4%
40−45
−86.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+63%
27
−63%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+91.3%
21−24
−91.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 28
+155%
10−12
−155%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Far Cry New Dawn 53
+141%
21−24
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Hitman 3 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
+186%
7−8
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+145%
10−12
−145%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Battlefield 5 37
+208%
12−14
−208%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 26
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how RX 580 and Pro Vega 16 compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 is 64% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 is 105% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 16 is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 is 260% faster than the Pro Vega 16.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 surpassed Pro Vega 16 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.94 12.43
Recency 18 April 2017 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15855 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.