Quadro NVS 140M vs Radeon RX 580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 with Quadro NVS 140M, including specs and performance data.

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
22.73
+11265%

RX 580 outperforms NVS 140M by a whopping 11265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2481398
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.78no data
Power efficiency8.571.39
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 20G86
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1257 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate193.03.200
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.73
+11265%
NVS 140M 0.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847
+11242%
NVS 140M 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+1500%
6
−1500%
1440p44-0−1
4K38-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p5.20no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1880%
5−6
−1880%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 0−1
Metro Exodus 83 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Valorant 90−95 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Dota 2 51 0−1
Far Cry 5 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Fortnite 110−120
+11700%
1−2
−11700%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1880%
5−6
−1880%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 77 0−1
Metro Exodus 57 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+3267%
6−7
−3267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+1750%
4−5
−1750%
Valorant 90−95 0−1
World of Tanks 240−250
+2164%
10−12
−2164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Dota 2 80−85 0−1
Far Cry 5 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1880%
5−6
−1880%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70
+1067%
6−7
−1067%
Valorant 90−95 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17300%
1−2
−17300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
World of Tanks 150−160
+15300%
1−2
−15300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1525%
4−5
−1525%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Metro Exodus 53 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Valorant 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 57
+280%
14−16
−280%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+280%
14−16
−280%
Metro Exodus 18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 73 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+280%
14−16
−280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%
Far Cry 5 30−33 0−1
Fortnite 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 18−20 0−1
Valorant 27−30 0−1

This is how RX 580 and NVS 140M compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 is 1500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 is 17300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 surpassed NVS 140M in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.73 0.20
Recency 18 April 2017 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 10 Watt

RX 580 has a 11265% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 140M, on the other hand, has 1750% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 140M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Quadro NVS 140M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 21735 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 140M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.