FirePro W9000 vs Radeon RX 580

Place in the ranking	248	344
Place by popularity	1	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.78	1.00
Power efficiency	8.57	4.01
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	Tahiti
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	14 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 has 1678% better value for money than FirePro W9000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	350 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	124.8
Floating-point processing power	6.175 TFLOPS	3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	279 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Form factor	no data	full height / full length
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	264 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI	+	-
StereoOutput3D	-	+
Dual-link DVI support	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.73
+44.1%

FirePro W9000 15.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847
+44.1%

FirePro W9000 6138

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	96 +47.7%	65−70 −47.7%
1440p	44 +46.7%	30−35 −46.7%
4K	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.39 +2479%	61.52 −2479%
1440p	5.20 +2461%	133.30 −2461%
4K	6.03 +2665%	166.63 −2665%

RX 580 has 2479% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 580 has 2461% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 580 has 2665% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%
Metro Exodus	83 +50.9%	55−60 −50.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
Valorant	90−95 +53.3%	60−65 −53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	117 +46.3%	80−85 −46.3%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Dota 2	51 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +46%	50−55 −46%
Fortnite	110−120 +47.5%	80−85 −47.5%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 +54%	50−55 −54%
Metro Exodus	57 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +44.3%	140−150 −44.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +48%	50−55 −48%
Valorant	90−95 +53.3%	60−65 −53.3%
World of Tanks	240−250 +46.5%	170−180 −46.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	68 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Dota 2	80−85 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +46%	50−55 −46%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Valorant	90−95 +53.3%	60−65 −53.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +45%	120−130 −45%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
World of Tanks	150−160 +54%	100−105 −54%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Metro Exodus	53 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Valorant	60−65 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Dota 2	57 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
Metro Exodus	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	73 +46%	50−55 −46%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	28 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Dota 2	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Fortnite	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Valorant	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%

This is how RX 580 and FirePro W9000 compete in popular games:

RX 580 is 48% faster in 1080p
RX 580 is 47% faster in 1440p
RX 580 is 58% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.73	15.77
Recency	18 April 2017	14 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	350 Watt

RX 580 has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 89.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while FirePro W9000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.