GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with GeForce 210, including specs and performance data.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.03
+6039%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms 210 by a whopping 6039% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2961330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.70no data
Power efficiency13.360.70
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 20GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $29.49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1000 MHz589 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate155.14.160
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s8.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
4K30-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.92
+653%
29.49
−653%
4K10.06no data
  • RX 580 Mobile has 653% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Fortnite 183
+9050%
2−3
−9050%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Valorant 130−140
+6850%
2−3
−6850%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+7400%
3−4
−7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 76
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Fortnite 81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Valorant 130−140
+6850%
2−3
−6850%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 0−1
Valorant 130−140
+6850%
2−3
−6850%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+6550%
2−3
−6550%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Valorant 170−180
+8650%
2−3
−8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+10200%
1−2
−10200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20 0−1

This is how RX 580 Mobile and GeForce 210 compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 7600% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.03 0.31
Recency 18 April 2017 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 6038.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 210, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 210 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3729 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 580 Mobile or GeForce 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.