ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs RX 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3601605
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.31no data
Power efficiency10.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 20RS200
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482
Core clock speed1168 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1244 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate159.20.37
Floating-point processing power5.095 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1282
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 570 6967
+348250%
ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85no data
1440p48no data
4K30no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.99no data
1440p3.52no data
4K5.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 88 no data
Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 77 no data
Fortnite 238 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100
+4900%
2−3
−4900%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+1500%
6−7
−1500%
Valorant 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75 no data
Counter-Strike 2 95−100 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+2289%
9−10
−2289%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 100−110
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Far Cry 5 70 no data
Fortnite 95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 94
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 73 no data
Metro Exodus 43 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 87
+1350%
6−7
−1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Valorant 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 68 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 100−110
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Far Cry 5 65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
Valorant 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 25 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 52 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 46 no data
Forza Horizon 4 59 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Metro Exodus 16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data
Valorant 95−100 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 31 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 39 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 570 is 4900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 570 surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 19 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

RX 570 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 570 and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9906 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 570 or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.