Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs ATI IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1605337
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Power efficiencyno data9.36
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRS200Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)15 October 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22048
Core clock speed183 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz1284 MHz
Number of transistors30 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37164.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.259 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4
RX 580 2048SP 7622
+381000%
Samples: 6444

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 15 October 2018
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

RX 580 2048SP has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and Radeon RX 580 2048SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4697 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or Radeon RX 580 2048SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.