Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 570

Place in performance ranking	285	134
Place by popularity	24	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.37	11.57
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 20 Ellesmere	N19E-Q5 MAX-Q
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data
Current price	$114 (0.7x MSRP)	$2130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 570 has 33% better value for money than RTX 5000 Max-Q.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3072
Core clock speed	1168 MHz	600 - 930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1244 MHz	1350 - 1455 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	80 - 90 Watt
Texture fill rate	159.2	259.2
Floating-point performance	5,095 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 570 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 570 18.04

RTX 5000 Max-Q 35.31
+95.7%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 570 6967

RTX 5000 Max-Q 13636
+95.7%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 96% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 570 18967

RTX 5000 Max-Q 26465
+39.5%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 40% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 570 45560

RTX 5000 Max-Q 53221
+16.8%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 17% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 570 13827

RTX 5000 Max-Q 19790
+43.1%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 43% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 570 71096
+9.8%

RTX 5000 Max-Q 64768

Radeon RX 570 outperforms Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q by 10% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 570 375145

RTX 5000 Max-Q 433183
+15.5%

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 570 by 15% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	87 −20.7%	105 +20.7%
1440p	47 −38.3%	65 +38.3%
4K	30 −40%	42 +40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Battlefield 5	106	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	no data
Far Cry 5	80	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100	no data
Hitman 3	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75	no data
Metro Exodus	101	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	51	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Battlefield 5	98	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	63	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	no data
Far Cry 5	69	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	61	no data
Forza Horizon 4	255	no data
Hitman 3	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75	no data
Metro Exodus	74	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	no data
Far Cry 5	46	no data
Forza Horizon 4	75	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	61	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	55	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	37	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11	no data
Far Cry 5	46	no data
Forza Horizon 4	59	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Metro Exodus	48	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	21	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	15	no data
Forza Horizon 4	39	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22	no data
Metro Exodus	26	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

no data

This is how RX 570 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Max-Q is 21% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Max-Q is 38% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Max-Q is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.04	35.31
Recency	18 April 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	80 Watt