Radeon Pro Vega II vs RX 560X Mobile

Place in performance ranking	393	93
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.16	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 11	Vega 20
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	5 January 2017 (7 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,199
Current price	$520	$9999 (4.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 560X Mobile and Pro Vega II have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	4096
Core clock speed	1172 MHz	1574 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60-80 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	440.3
Floating-point performance	2,611 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560X Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega II compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	Apple MPX
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1612 MBps
Memory bandwidth	92.8 GB/s	825.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−261%

130−140
+261%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−248%

80−85
+248%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −260%	90−95 +260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30 −233%	100−105 +233%
Battlefield 5	49 −247%	170−180 +247%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −253%	60−65 +253%
Far Cry 5	35 −243%	120−130 +243%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 −257%	150−160 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	52 −246%	180−190 +246%
Hitman 3	24 −254%	85−90 +254%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −248%	160−170 +248%
Metro Exodus	45 −256%	160−170 +256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	47 −262%	170−180 +262%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 −253%	180−190 +253%
Watch Dogs: Legion	29 −245%	100−105 +245%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21 −257%	75−80 +257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 −257%	75−80 +257%
Battlefield 5	36 −261%	130−140 +261%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 −233%	50−55 +233%
Far Cry 5	29 −245%	100−105 +245%
Far Cry New Dawn	28 −257%	100−105 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	105 −233%	350−400 +233%
Hitman 3	23 −248%	80−85 +248%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −248%	160−170 +248%
Metro Exodus	35 −243%	120−130 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 −243%	120−130 +243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 −257%	150−160 +257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 −261%	130−140 +261%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −259%	140−150 +259%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −244%	55−60 +244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −246%	45−50 +246%
Far Cry 5	21 −257%	75−80 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	38 −242%	130−140 +242%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −248%	160−170 +248%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 −251%	130−140 +251%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −264%	80−85 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 −264%	40−45 +264%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30
−233%

100−105

+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −257%	75−80 +257%
Hitman 3	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −248%	80−85 +248%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−261%

65−70
+261%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−250%

35−40
+250%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and Pro Vega II compete in popular games:

Pro Vega II is 261% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.08	40.37
Recency	5 January 2017	3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	475 Watt