Radeon Pro 580X vs RX 560X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile with Radeon Pro 580X, including specs and performance data.

RX 560X Mobile
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
10.84

Pro 580X outperforms RX 560X Mobile by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.519.02
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)18 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
Core clock speed1275 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60172.8
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs64144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1450 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Elden Ring 31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Metro Exodus 39
−79.5%
70−75
+79.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 47
−80.9%
85−90
+80.9%
Valorant 50
−80%
90−95
+80%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Dota 2 47
−80.9%
85−90
+80.9%
Elden Ring 28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Far Cry 5 28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Fortnite 50
−80%
90−95
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 42
−78.6%
75−80
+78.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Metro Exodus 26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 101
−78.2%
180−190
+78.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Valorant 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
World of Tanks 122
−80.3%
220−230
+80.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Dota 2 66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Valorant 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Elden Ring 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
World of Tanks 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Dota 2 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Elden Ring 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Valorant 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and Pro 580X compete in popular games:

  • Pro 580X is 76% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 19.61
Recency 11 April 2018 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Pro 580X, on the other hand, has a 80.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Pro 580X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 580X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 415 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.