L20 vs Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile with L20, including specs and performance data.
L20 outperforms 560X Mobile by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 489 | 188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.74 | 8.99 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 April 2018 (8 years ago) | 16 November 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 11776 |
| Core clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1202 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 927.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.611 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 128 |
| TMUs | 64 | 368 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 368 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 92 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 11.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1450 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 92.8 GB/s | 864.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 34
−224%
| 110−120
+224%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−215%
|
170−180
+215%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
−204%
|
70−75
+204%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 31
−223%
|
100−105
+223%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 52
−208%
|
160−170
+208%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−215%
|
170−180
+215%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 17
−224%
|
55−60
+224%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
−208%
|
120−130
+208%
|
| Fortnite | 66
−218%
|
210−220
+218%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 52
−208%
|
160−170
+208%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 34
−224%
|
110−120
+224%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50
−220%
|
160−170
+220%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
−216%
|
300−310
+216%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 44
−218%
|
140−150
+218%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−215%
|
170−180
+215%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 122
−187%
|
350−400
+187%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
−200%
|
45−50
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 71
−224%
|
230−240
+224%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
| Fortnite | 44
−218%
|
140−150
+218%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 49
−206%
|
150−160
+206%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 31
−223%
|
100−105
+223%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 36
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20
−200%
|
60−65
+200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 42
−210%
|
130−140
+210%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
−216%
|
300−310
+216%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 39
−208%
|
120−130
+208%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
−208%
|
40−45
+208%
|
| Dota 2 | 66
−218%
|
210−220
+218%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 33
−203%
|
100−105
+203%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 38
−216%
|
120−130
+216%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30
−217%
|
95−100
+217%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
−218%
|
70−75
+218%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
−216%
|
300−310
+216%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 33
−203%
|
100−105
+203%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
−216%
|
60−65
+216%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
−216%
|
240−250
+216%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−221%
|
45−50
+221%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−214%
|
160−170
+214%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
−218%
|
350−400
+218%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−220%
|
80−85
+220%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−200%
|
24−27
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−210%
|
65−70
+210%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−213%
|
75−80
+213%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−221%
|
45−50
+221%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24
−210%
|
65−70
+210%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−210%
|
65−70
+210%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−221%
|
170−180
+221%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−208%
|
40−45
+208%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−197%
|
110−120
+197%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−200%
|
30−33
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−224%
|
55−60
+224%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−200%
|
30−33
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
−200%
|
30−33
+200%
|
This is how RX 560X Mobile and L20 compete in popular games:
- L20 is 224% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.91 | 32.11 |
| Recency | 11 April 2018 | 16 November 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 275 Watt |
RX 560X Mobile has 323% lower power consumption.
L20, on the other hand, has a 224% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The L20 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while L20 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
