Radeon Pro 570 vs RX 5600 XT

Place in performance ranking	133	308
Place by popularity	100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.42	12.97
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 10	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 January 2020 (4 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	no data
Current price	$94 (0.3x MSRP)	$356

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 73% better value for money than Pro 570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1792
Core clock speed	1235 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	1105 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.6	123.8
Floating-point performance	no data	3,584 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon Pro 570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6780 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	217.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.39
+116%

Pro 570 16.41

RX 5600 XT outperforms Pro 570 by 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5600 XT 13667
+116%

Pro 570 6336

RX 5600 XT outperforms Pro 570 by 116% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 +131%	45−50 −131%
1440p	60 +122%	27−30 −122%
4K	34 +143%	14−16 −143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

83
+137%

35−40

−137%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +133%	27−30 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +130%	40−45 −130%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +130%	50−55 −130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	104 +131%	45−50 −131%
Cyberpunk 2077	74 +147%	30−33 −147%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +123%	35−40 −123%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +123%	40−45 −123%
Forza Horizon 4	185 +118%	85−90 −118%
Hitman 3	83 +137%	35−40 −137%
Horizon Zero Dawn	213 +124%	95−100 −124%
Metro Exodus	144 +122%	65−70 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	112 +124%	50−55 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190 +124%	85−90 −124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	104 +131%	45−50 −131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +133%	27−30 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +117%	35−40 −117%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +130%	50−55 −130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	98 +118%	45−50 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +133%	27−30 −133%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +123%	35−40 −123%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +123%	40−45 −123%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +132%	60−65 −132%
Hitman 3	79 +126%	35−40 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	272 +127%	120−130 −127%
Metro Exodus	133 +122%	60−65 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	101 +124%	45−50 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	158 +126%	70−75 −126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140 +133%	60−65 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	248 +125%	110−120 −125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +133%	27−30 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	62 +130%	27−30 −130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +126%	35−40 −126%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +125%	24−27 −125%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +123%	35−40 −123%
Forza Horizon 4	138 +130%	60−65 −130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	115 +130%	50−55 −130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	141 +117%	65−70 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +119%	16−18 −119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

88
+120%

40−45

−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +123%	30−33 −123%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +140%	35−40 −140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +138%	16−18 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	71 +137%	30−33 −137%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +118%	50−55 −118%
Hitman 3	52 +117%	24−27 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Metro Exodus	88 +120%	40−45 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	97 +143%	40−45 −143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +133%	21−24 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21 +133%	9−10 −133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

69
+130%

30−33

−130%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Hitman 3	36 +125%	16−18 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +144%	18−20 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +136%	14−16 −136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +119%	21−24 −119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	37 +131%	16−18 −131%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +133%	30−33 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	54 +125%	24−27 −125%
Metro Exodus	46 +119%	21−24 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 +120%	5−6 −120%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

39
+117%

18−20

−117%

This is how RX 5600 XT and Pro 570 compete in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is 131% faster in 1080p
RX 5600 XT is 122% faster in 1440p
RX 5600 XT is 143% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.39	16.41
Recency	21 January 2020	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	120 Watt