ATI Radeon 9000 vs RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon 9000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.28
+352700%

RX 5600 XT outperforms ATI 9000 by a whopping 352700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1431514
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.88no data
Power efficiency16.140.02
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 10RV250
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1130 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate224.61.000
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.28
+352700%
ATI 9000 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13590
+339650%
ATI 9000 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107-0−1
1440p61-0−1
4K36-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.61no data
1440p4.57no data
4K7.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92 0−1
Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 74 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Hitman 3 83 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 275 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 112 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 262 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 173 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76 0−1
Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 63 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Hitman 3 83 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 272 0−1
Metro Exodus 140 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 94 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 248 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 54 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 138 0−1
Hitman 3 77 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 115 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 35 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 0−1
Hitman 3 52 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 89 0−1
Metro Exodus 88 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 242 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 0−1
Hitman 3 36 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 107 0−1
Metro Exodus 51 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 11 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 39 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.28 0.01
Recency 21 January 2020 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 352700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000, on the other hand, has 435.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
ATI Radeon 9000
Radeon 9000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2867 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.