Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with Quadro FX 3700, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.38
+3510%

RX 5600 XT outperforms FX 3700 by a whopping 3510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1331074
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.420.02
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 10G92
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $1,599
Current price$94 (0.3x MSRP)$256 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 112000% better value for money than FX 3700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304112
Core clock speed1235 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt78 Watt
Texture fill rate224.628.00
Floating-point performanceno data280 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.38
+3510%
FX 3700 0.98

Radeon RX 5600 XT outperforms Quadro FX 3700 by 3510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5600 XT 13664
+3524%
FX 3700 377

Radeon RX 5600 XT outperforms Quadro FX 3700 by 3524% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+5100%
2−3
−5100%
1440p60
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
4K340−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2950−3000
+3454%
83
−3454%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2250−2300
+3471%
60−65
−3471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3300−3350
+3487%
92
−3487%
Battlefield 5 4100−4150
+3496%
110−120
−3496%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3750−3800
+3506%
104
−3506%
Cyberpunk 2077 2650−2700
+3481%
74
−3481%
Far Cry 5 2800−2850
+3490%
75−80
−3490%
Far Cry New Dawn 3200−3250
+3496%
85−90
−3496%
Forza Horizon 4 6650−6700
+3495%
185
−3495%
Hitman 3 2950−3000
+3454%
83
−3454%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7650−7700
+3492%
213
−3492%
Metro Exodus 5150−5200
+3476%
144
−3476%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4000−4050
+3471%
112
−3471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6850−6900
+3505%
190
−3505%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3750−3800
+3506%
104
−3506%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2250−2300
+3471%
60−65
−3471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2700−2750
+3453%
76
−3453%
Battlefield 5 4100−4150
+3496%
110−120
−3496%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3500−3550
+3471%
98
−3471%
Cyberpunk 2077 2250−2300
+3471%
63
−3471%
Far Cry 5 2800−2850
+3490%
75−80
−3490%
Far Cry New Dawn 3200−3250
+3496%
85−90
−3496%
Forza Horizon 4 5000−5050
+3497%
130−140
−3497%
Hitman 3 2850−2900
+3508%
79
−3508%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9800−9850
+3503%
272
−3503%
Metro Exodus 4800−4850
+3509%
133
−3509%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3600−3650
+3464%
101
−3464%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5700−5750
+3508%
158
−3508%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5050−5100
+3507%
140
−3507%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8950−9000
+3509%
248
−3509%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2250−2300
+3471%
60−65
−3471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2200−2250
+3448%
62
−3448%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2850−2900
+3508%
79
−3508%
Cyberpunk 2077 1900−1950
+3419%
54
−3419%
Far Cry 5 2800−2850
+3490%
75−80
−3490%
Forza Horizon 4 4950−5000
+3487%
138
−3487%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4150−4200
+3509%
115
−3509%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5050−5100
+3482%
141
−3482%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3000−3050
+3471%
84
−3471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1250−1300
+3471%
35
−3471%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3150−3200
+3480%
88
−3480%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2400−2450
+3482%
65−70
−3482%
Far Cry New Dawn 3000−3050
+3471%
84
−3471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1350−1400
+3453%
35−40
−3453%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1600−1650
+3456%
45
−3456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2550−2600
+3492%
71
−3492%
Cyberpunk 2077 1050−1100
+3400%
30
−3400%
Far Cry 5 3200−3250
+3496%
89
−3496%
Forza Horizon 4 3900−3950
+3478%
109
−3478%
Hitman 3 1850−1900
+3458%
52
−3458%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3200−3250
+3496%
89
−3496%
Metro Exodus 3150−3200
+3480%
88
−3480%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3500−3550
+3508%
97
−3508%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1750−1800
+3471%
45−50
−3471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+3471%
21
−3471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2450−2500
+3451%
69
−3451%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1250−1300
+3471%
35−40
−3471%
Far Cry New Dawn 1000−1050
+3348%
27−30
−3348%
Hitman 3 1250−1300
+3372%
36
−3372%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1550−1600
+3423%
40−45
−3423%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1150−1200
+3385%
33
−3385%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1650−1700
+3487%
46
−3487%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 800−850
+3378%
21−24
−3378%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 750−800
+3471%
21
−3471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1300−1350
+3414%
37
−3414%
Cyberpunk 2077 400−450
+3233%
12
−3233%
Far Cry 5 700−750
+3400%
20−22
−3400%
Forza Horizon 4 2500−2550
+3471%
70
−3471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1900−1950
+3419%
54
−3419%
Metro Exodus 1650−1700
+3487%
46
−3487%
Watch Dogs: Legion 350−400
+3082%
11
−3082%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1400−1450
+3490%
39
−3490%

This is how RX 5600 XT and FX 3700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 5100% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 5900% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.38 0.98
Recency 21 January 2020 8 January 2008
Cost $279 $1599
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 78 Watt

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2398 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 20 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.