Radeon Pro 5600M vs RX 560

Place in performance ranking	436	212
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.54	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	15 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	no data
Current price	$381 (3.8x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	164.8
Floating-point performance	2,611 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560 and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	170 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 9.44

Pro 5600M 24.11
+155%

Pro 5600M outperforms RX 560 by 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 560 3647

Pro 5600M 9313
+155%

Pro 5600M outperforms RX 560 by 155% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−143%

85−90
+143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−179%

35−40
+179%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −167%	55−60 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −163%	100−110 +163%
Hitman 3	18−20 −167%	45−50 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −167%	60−65 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −173%	80−85 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −156%	65−70 +156%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −167%	55−60 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −163%	100−110 +163%
Hitman 3	18−20 −167%	45−50 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −167%	60−65 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −173%	80−85 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −157%	50−55 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −156%	65−70 +156%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −167%	55−60 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −163%	100−110 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −173%	80−85 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −157%	50−55 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −156%	65−70 +156%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−167%

60−65
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −183%	50−55 +183%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −156%	40−45 +156%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −167%	45−50 +167%
Hitman 3	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−186%

40−45
+186%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −171%	18−20 +171%
Hitman 3	7−8 −171%	18−20 +171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −180%	27−30 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −175%	30−35 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −180%	27−30 +180%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−163%

21−24

+163%

This is how RX 560 and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

Pro 5600M is 143% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.44	24.11
Recency	18 April 2017	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt