Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon RX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RX 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.32

Pro B50 outperforms 560 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking521194
Place by popularity89not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4847.45
Power efficiency8.9434.32
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code namePolaris 21BMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B50 has 3106% better value for money than RX 560.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1175 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60332.8
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Length170 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 560 8.32
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+258%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 560 3679
Samples: 4700
Arc Pro B50 13186
+258%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−243%
120−130
+243%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.83
+2.8%
2.91
−2.8%
  • RX 560 and Arc Pro B50 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.32 29.82
Recency 18 April 2017 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has a 258.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 3157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.