Radeon RX 460 Mobile vs RX 560 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 560 Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5
11.25
+10.8%

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 460 Mobile by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking384407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money6.20no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 11Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2017 (7 years old)8 August 2016 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $86
Current price$468 (4.7x MSRP)$95 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024896
Core clock speed1175 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9766.08
Floating-point performance2,462 gflops2,115 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560 Mobile and Radeon RX 460 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 Mobile 11.25
+10.8%
RX 460 Mobile 10.15

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 460 Mobile by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 560 Mobile 8329
+6.9%
RX 460 Mobile 7793

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 460 Mobile by 7% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 560 Mobile 5738
+12.3%
RX 460 Mobile 5108

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 460 Mobile by 12% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 560 Mobile 36528
+16.7%
RX 460 Mobile 31294

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 460 Mobile by 17% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+29.4%
34
−29.4%
4K36
+20%
30−35
−20%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 35
+40%
24−27
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 30
+20%
24−27
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+16.7%
30
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 27
+8%
24−27
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how RX 560 Mobile and RX 460 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 29.4% faster than RX 460 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 20% faster than RX 460 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 560 Mobile is 40% faster than the RX 460 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.25 10.15
Recency 5 January 2017 8 August 2016
Cost $99.99 $86

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile
Radeon RX 560 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 47 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 15 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.