Radeon RX 9060 XT vs RX 550X Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550X Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX 550X Mobile
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.53

RX 9060 XT outperforms RX 550X Mobile by a whopping 755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.3823.63
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 April 2018 (7 years ago)18 May 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
Core clock speed1100 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz3230 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate51.48413.4
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−746%
220−230
+746%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−733%
200−210
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Far Cry 5 21
−710%
170−180
+710%
Fortnite 30−35
−753%
290−300
+753%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Valorant 65−70
−733%
550−600
+733%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−733%
200−210
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−742%
800−850
+742%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Dota 2 53
−749%
450−500
+749%
Far Cry 5 18
−733%
150−160
+733%
Fortnite 30−35
−753%
290−300
+753%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−750%
170−180
+750%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−750%
170−180
+750%
Valorant 65−70
−733%
550−600
+733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−733%
200−210
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Dota 2 49
−716%
400−450
+716%
Far Cry 5 15
−700%
120−130
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Valorant 65−70
−733%
550−600
+733%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−753%
290−300
+753%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−695%
350−400
+695%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Valorant 60−65
−681%
500−550
+681%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Valorant 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Dota 2 20−22
−750%
170−180
+750%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and RX 9060 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT is 746% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.53 47.30
Recency 11 April 2018 18 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

RX 550X Mobile has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has a 755.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 228 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550X Mobile or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.