Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs RX 550X Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550X Mobile with Radeon Pro 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX 550X Mobile
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.24

Pro 5700 XT outperforms RX 550X Mobile by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking597175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.3417.22
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed1100 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz1499 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate51.48239.8
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS7.675 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−400%
130−140
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Far Cry 5 21
−424%
110−120
+424%
Fortnite 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Valorant 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−426%
500−550
+426%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Dota 2 53
−428%
280−290
+428%
Far Cry 5 18
−428%
95−100
+428%
Fortnite 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−400%
100−105
+400%
Valorant 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Dota 2 49
−431%
260−270
+431%
Far Cry 5 15
−433%
80−85
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−400%
65−70
+400%
Valorant 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−423%
230−240
+423%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−414%
190−200
+414%
Valorant 60−65
−369%
300−310
+369%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and Pro 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5700 XT is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 28.11
Recency 11 April 2018 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 130 Watt

RX 550X Mobile has 160% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 436.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 43 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550X Mobile or Radeon Pro 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.