Radeon Graphics vs RX 550X Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550X Mobile with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

RX 550X Mobile
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.06
+206%

RX 550X Mobile outperforms Graphics by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking584900
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiency8.309.04
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 23Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640448
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1287 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate51.4842.00
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+225%
8−9
−225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • RX 550X Mobile is 225% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.06 1.98
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

RX 550X Mobile has a 206.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 550X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6373 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.