RTX A400 vs Radeon RX 550X Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550X Mobile with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

RX 550X Mobile
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.58

RTX A400 outperforms 550X Mobile by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking646395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.5721.97
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 April 2018 (7 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1100 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate51.4842.29
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−150%
65−70
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 21
−138%
50−55
+138%
Fortnite 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Valorant 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Dota 2 53
−145%
130−140
+145%
Far Cry 5 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Fortnite 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−150%
50−55
+150%
Valorant 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Dota 2 49
−145%
120−130
+145%
Far Cry 5 15
−133%
35−40
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Valorant 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
Valorant 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Valorant 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A400 is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.58 14.30
Recency 11 April 2018 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm

RTX A400 has a 156.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550X Mobile or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.