Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX 550X Mobile
6.04

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 26% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking549491
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
Value for money8.66no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 12Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2019 (5 years old)15 August 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$299 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64080
Core clock speed1176 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate51.48no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 550X Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 550X Mobile 6.04
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.60
+25.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 26% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 550X Mobile 14520
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+49.7%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 50% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 550X Mobile 5345
+0.2%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 550X Mobile 3688
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
+8.7%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 9% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 550X Mobile 20039
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21818
+8.9%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 9% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 550X Mobile 184578
+10.9%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479

Radeon RX 550X Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by 11% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RX 550X Mobile 35
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 44
+25.1%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon RX 550X Mobile by 25% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+36.8%
19
−36.8%
1440p7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
4K10−12
−40%
14
+40%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−171%
19
+171%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−36.8%
26
+36.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Far Cry 5 21
+5%
20
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Hitman 3 14−16
−100%
28
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−25%
15
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−109%
23
+109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−129%
16
+129%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−21.1%
23
+21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
−5.6%
19
+5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−78.6%
25
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Hitman 3 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−10%
22
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−21.1%
23
+21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Far Cry 5 15
−20%
18
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 550X Mobile is 36.8% faster than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

1440p resolution:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 42.9% faster than RX 550X Mobile

4K resolution:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 40% faster than RX 550X Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 550X Mobile is 83.3% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 300% faster than the RX 550X Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 550X Mobile is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 6.04 7.60
Recency 10 January 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 36 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 734 votes

Rate Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.