Tegra 3 vs Radeon RX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tegra 3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (6 years ago)9 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data416 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate162.44.160
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 9 November 2011
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 20 Watt

RX 5500 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 3, on the other hand, has 450% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 and Tegra 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
NVIDIA Tegra 3
Tegra 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 265 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Tegra 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 or Tegra 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.