Playstation 3 RSX 65nm vs Radeon RX 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking248not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.22no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 14RSX-CXD2991
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate162.413.20
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs8824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 58 Watt

RX 5500 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX 65nm, on the other hand, has 89.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 and Playstation 3 RSX 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop card while Playstation 3 RSX 65nm is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 65nm
Playstation 3 RSX 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 222 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 26 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.