Tesla V100 SXM2 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking296not rated
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.74no data
Power efficiency12.85no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2019 (6 years ago)21 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14085120
Core clock speed1607 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate162.4438.4
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32128
TMUs88320
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s900.1 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2019 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 2 years, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop graphics card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3502 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 47 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 XT or Tesla V100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.