Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 XT with Radeon Pro Vega II Duo, including specs and performance data.

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.68

Pro Vega II Duo outperforms RX 5500 XT by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233131
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.776.90
Power efficiency12.705.33
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2019 (4 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 607% better value for money than Pro Vega II Duo.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084096
Core clock speed1607 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate162.4440.3
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs88256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Apple MPX
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s1.02 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.68
Pro Vega II Duo 36.34
+53.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9133
Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+53.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD76
−44.7%
110−120
+44.7%
1440p42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
4K24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.2239.99
1440p4.0273.32
4K7.04125.69

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
−41%
110−120
+41%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−41%
110−120
+41%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−50%
210−220
+50%
Hitman 3 64
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−45.5%
160−170
+45.5%
Metro Exodus 132
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
−48.1%
160−170
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 66
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−41%
110−120
+41%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−50%
210−220
+50%
Hitman 3 62
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−45.5%
160−170
+45.5%
Metro Exodus 94
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
−48.1%
160−170
+48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−50%
60−65
+50%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−51.8%
85−90
+51.8%
Hitman 3 55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
−49.4%
130−140
+49.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76
−44.7%
110−120
+44.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−48.1%
200−210
+48.1%
Hitman 3 36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
−46.2%
95−100
+46.2%
Metro Exodus 60
−50%
90−95
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 184
−52.2%
280−290
+52.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Hitman 3 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−47.5%
180−190
+47.5%
Metro Exodus 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
−50%
21−24
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

This is how RX 5500 XT and Pro Vega II Duo compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega II Duo is 45% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega II Duo is 43% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega II Duo is 46% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.68 36.34
Recency 12 December 2019 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 475 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 6 months, and 265.4% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II Duo, on the other hand, has a 53.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2865 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 182 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.