Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 with Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), including specs and performance data.

RX 550
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.06
+188%

RX 550 outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking519801
Place by popularity13not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameLexaBristol Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data
Current price$121 (1.5x MSRP)$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1183 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate37.86no data
Floating-point performance1,211 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 550 and Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+169%
13
−169%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+173%
11
−173%
Hitman 3 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hitman 3 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+167%
6
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how RX 550 and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • RX 550 is 169% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.06 2.45
Recency 20 April 2017 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 12 Watt

The Radeon RX 550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 is a desktop card while Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5884 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.