Radeon HD 7970M vs RX 550

Place in performance ranking	519	446
Place by popularity	13	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.05	3.84
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	Lexa	Wimbledon XT
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 April 2017 (7 years ago)	1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79	no data
Current price	$121 (1.5x MSRP)	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7970M has 26% better value for money than RX 550.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1280
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	850 MHz
Boost clock speed	1183 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,200 million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	37.86	68.00
Floating-point performance	1,211 gflops	2,176 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 550 and Radeon HD 7970M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	153.6 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 550 7.06

HD 7970M 9.14
+29.5%

HD 7970M outperforms RX 550 by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 550 2727

HD 7970M 3529
+29.4%

HD 7970M outperforms RX 550 by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	60−65 −40%	84 +40%
Full HD	45−50 −40%	63 +40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−28.6%

18−20
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −25%	55−60 +25%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −25%	55−60 +25%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −25%	55−60 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−15.4%

30−33
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Hitman 3	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−20%

18−20
+20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−11.1%

10−11

+11.1%

This is how RX 550 and HD 7970M compete in popular games:

HD 7970M is 40% faster in 900p
HD 7970M is 40% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.06	9.14
Recency	20 April 2017	1 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt