Quadro NVS 130M vs Radeon RX 550

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	519	not rated
Place by popularity	13	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.05	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Lexa	G86M
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	20 April 2017 (7 years ago)	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79	no data
Current price	$121 (1.5x MSRP)	$105

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	8
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1183 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,200 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	37.86	1.600
Floating-point performance	1,211 gflops	12.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 550 and Quadro NVS 130M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 April 2017	9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---