Radeon RX 7600M XT vs RX 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
11.15

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking390175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.66no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)RDNA 3
GPU code nameNavi 14 / E19M-E65Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$525 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082048
Core clock speed1036 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1445 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate127.2320.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5300M and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 11.15
RX 7600M XT 29.72
+167%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5300M 4307
RX 7600M XT 11480
+167%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 167% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5300M 14351
RX 7600M XT 36365
+153%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 153% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5300M 39264
RX 7600M XT 93477
+138%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 138% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 5300M 10306
RX 7600M XT 28271
+174%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 174% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 5300M 55837
RX 7600M XT 152894
+174%

RX 7600M XT outperforms RX 5300M by 174% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
−73.4%
111
+73.4%
1440p21−24
−186%
60
+186%
4K12−14
−167%
32
+167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 59 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 87 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 71 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 61 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 54 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 66 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 61 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 38 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how RX 5300M and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 73% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 186% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 167% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 29.72
Recency 13 November 2019 5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 93 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.