Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RX 5300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon RX 6750 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5300
2020
3 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
19.73

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX 5300 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.88
Power efficiency13.6114.92
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082560
Core clock speed1327 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate144.8416.0
Floating-point processing power4.632 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs88160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length180 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300 19.73
RX 6750 XT 54.05
+174%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300 7587
RX 6750 XT 20783
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−175%
165
+175%
1440p30−35
−190%
87
+190%
4K18−20
−183%
51
+183%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.33
1440pno data6.31
4Kno data10.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%
Elden Ring 197
+0%
197
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 368
+0%
368
+0%
Metro Exodus 150
+0%
150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Elden Ring 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260
+0%
260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Elden Ring 126
+0%
126
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+0%
186
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Elden Ring 59
+0%
59
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how RX 5300 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 175% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 190% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 183% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.73 54.05
Recency 28 May 2020 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

RX 5300 has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 173.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2664 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.