HD Graphics 4400 vs Radeon RX 480 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code namePolarisHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2016 (8 years ago)5 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230420
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate155.122.00
Floating-point processing power4.963 gflops0.352 gflops
ROPs322
TMUs14420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2016 5 June 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

RX 480 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 4400, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 Mobile and HD Graphics 4400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
Radeon RX 480 Mobile
Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1338 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.