TITAN RTX vs Radeon RX 470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated95
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.29
Power efficiencyno data12.40
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereTU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 October 2016 (9 years ago)18 December 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924608
Core clock speed926 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate135.1509.8
Floating-point processing power4.322 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs112288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache448 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 October 2016 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

RX 470D has 133% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470D and TITAN RTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 155 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 877 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 470D or TITAN RTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.