T400 vs Radeon RX 470

Place in performance ranking	245	436
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.32	16.46
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 10 Pro	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2016 (7 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data
Current price	$14.08 (0.1x MSRP)	$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 209% better value for money than RX 470.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	926 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	154.4	34.20
Floating-point performance	4,940 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6600 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 20.92
+123%

T400 9.37

Radeon RX 470 outperforms T400 by 123% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 470 8096
+123%

T400 3628

Radeon RX 470 outperforms T400 by 123% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70 +133%	30−35 −133%
1440p	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
4K	36 +125%	16−18 −125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+136%

14−16

−136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +133%	30−33 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +125%	24−27 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Far Cry New Dawn	74 +147%	30−33 −147%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +137%	30−33 −137%
Hitman 3	60−65 +126%	27−30 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +133%	30−33 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +125%	24−27 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Far Cry New Dawn	68 +127%	30−33 −127%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +137%	30−33 −137%
Hitman 3	60−65 +126%	27−30 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70 +133%	30−33 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +133%	30−33 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	61 +126%	27−30 −126%
Far Cry New Dawn	63 +133%	27−30 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +137%	30−33 −137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 +150%	16−18 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +158%	12−14 −158%
Hitman 3	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry 5	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +156%	18−20 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +140%	10−11 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

This is how RX 470 and T400 compete in popular games:

RX 470 is 133% faster than T400 in 1080p
RX 470 is 128% faster than T400 in 1440p
RX 470 is 125% faster than T400 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.92	9.37
Recency	4 August 2016	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	30 Watt