ATI Radeon HD 4270 vs RX 470

Place in the ranking	265	1345
Place by popularity	46	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.98	no data
Power efficiency	12.10	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RV6xx (2008−2010)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	RS880M
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	40
Core clock speed	926 MHz	590 MHz
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	154.4	no data
Floating-point processing power	4.94 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	10.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.06
+7421%

ATI HD 4270 0.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096
+7328%

ATI HD 4270 109

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	71	0−1
1440p	39	0−1
4K	38	0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.52	no data
1440p	4.59	no data
4K	4.71	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Forza Horizon 4	105 +2000%	5−6 −2000%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60	0−1
Metro Exodus	74	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
Valorant	85−90 +8400%	1−2 −8400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Dota 2	48	0−1
Far Cry 5	52 +767%	6−7 −767%
Fortnite	110−120 +10900%	1−2 −10900%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +1660%	5−6 −1660%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	73	0−1
Metro Exodus	34	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	71 +1083%	6−7 −1083%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Valorant	85−90 +8400%	1−2 −8400%
World of Tanks	230−240 +1883%	12−14 −1883%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Dota 2	70−75	0−1
Far Cry 5	65−70 +1050%	6−7 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	67 +1240%	5−6 −1240%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	59 +883%	6−7 −883%
Valorant	85−90 +8400%	1−2 −8400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	33	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	33	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +8550%	2−3 −8550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	0−1
World of Tanks	140−150 +14100%	1−2 −14100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +1350%	4−5 −1350%
Forza Horizon 4	51	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	30−35	0−1
Metro Exodus	46	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Valorant	55−60 +1275%	4−5 −1275%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20	0−1
Dota 2	33 +120%	14−16 −120%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +120%	14−16 −120%
Metro Exodus	16−18	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	62 +6100%	1−2 −6100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 +120%	14−16 −120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	18−20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Dota 2	86 +473%	14−16 −473%
Far Cry 5	27−30	0−1
Fortnite	25	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	25	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	16−18	0−1
Valorant	24−27	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 is 8550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 470 is ahead in 30 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.06	0.28
Recency	4 August 2016	1 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm

RX 470 has a 7421.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 4270 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.