Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 470
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
20.95
+20.5%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking243293
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.32no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 10 ProN19P-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 August 2016 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data
Current price$14.08 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed926 MHz795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate154.475.60
Floating-point performance4,940 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 470 and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6600 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 20.95
+20.5%
T1000 Max-Q 17.39

Radeon RX 470 outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 470 8096
+20.5%
T1000 Max-Q 6719

Radeon RX 470 outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 20% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
1440p47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
4K39
+30%
30−35
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+21.1%
55−60
−21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+15.2%
45−50
−15.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+20.8%
45−50
−20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.2%
55−60
−17.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+22%
40−45
−22%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+23.2%
55−60
−23.2%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+19.2%
50−55
−19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+114%
45−50
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+21.1%
55−60
−21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 52
+13%
45−50
−13%
Far Cry New Dawn 34
−41.2%
45−50
+41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.2%
55−60
−17.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+22%
40−45
−22%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+23.2%
55−60
−23.2%
Metro Exodus 68
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
−11.4%
45−50
+11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+89.2%
35−40
−89.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+15.2%
45−50
−15.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.2%
55−60
−17.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+32.1%
55−60
−32.1%
Metro Exodus 63
+21.2%
50−55
−21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+17.6%
30−35
−17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+27.3%
30−35
−27.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 43
+48.3%
27−30
−48.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+20.6%
30−35
−20.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Metro Exodus 46
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+50%
30−35
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 39
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Hitman 3 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Metro Exodus 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%

This is how RX 470 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RX 470 is 27% faster in 1080p
  • RX 470 is 34% faster in 1440p
  • RX 470 is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 470 is 114% faster.
  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 470 is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.95 17.39
Recency 4 August 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3879 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.